20 animal testing articles to support your persuasive essay people for the ethical treatment of animals is the self-proclaimed largest animal rights organization in the world and focuses on ending animal cruelty although this blog post contains 20 credible animal testing articles to support a persuasive essay, not all of the articles. List of disadvantages of animal testing on cosmetics 1 it is still possible that animals receive inhumane treatment during the tests, it is highly possible that animals would experience inhumane treatment, where they are being restrained. Some of these tests could not, ethically, be done on humans without prior animal testing and viable alternatives to animal testing are not yet available for all stages of trials needed before a treatment can be tested on humans. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals' rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other means of testing product toxicity are available.
The cure for rabies and anthrax can be very well accredited to animals there are certain other medical developments also that could be achievable because of use of animals as testing these diseases include arthritis, whooping cough, leprosy, diphtheria, rubella, and measles. Perhaps most visible among them is the people for the ethical treatment of animals (peta) the group, whose leader famously equated rats and children, saying “a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy,” recently celebrated its 30 th anniversary. Benefits of animal research in the late 1940s, polio crippled and killed thousands of people around the world every year polio reached a peak in the united states in 1952, with over 21,000 paralytic cases.
Researchers at memorial sloan-kettering cancer center, a large human oncology hospital in new york city, were working on testing a vaccine treatment for people with melanomathe vaccine was designed to simulate the patient’s immune system to attack the cancer cells. A new tool could help us finally eliminate animal testing debate on the ethics of animal testing with equal or better results — and an ethical quandary eliminated — it’s safe to say. I’ve got a question i’m doing a debate on the topic: we should ban animal testing but, while doing some thinking i came across this: we have human trials for new drugs, animals like dogs also use need medicine and obviously this needs to be tested, so eventually it will end up been tests on animals. The us national academy of sciences released a report in 2007 envisioning a future in which animals would largely disappear from toxicity testing programs the report, drafted by a panel of experts, proposed that toxicity induced by drugs, food additives, pesticides, and other chemicals be assessed.
- animal testing animal testing is the running of tests and the research done in a laboratory on animals some of the tests are done to benefit human lives and other tests are done to determine side effects of a certain household or cosmetic products. Background and context animal testing or animal research is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation it is estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide — from zebrafish to non-human primates — are used annually. However, total elimination of animal testing will significantly set back the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment by employing the 3rs when continuing to use animals for scientific research, the scientific community can affirm its moral conscience as well as uphold its obligation to humanity to further the. The practice of animal testing should be banned, considering that it is harmful from the ethical, environmental as well as the economical point of view making use of alternatives that are available for animal experimentation is therefore, a better choice.
In the us and the eu, a drug’s efficacy and safety must be tested in animals before it enters human testing, though a 2010 directive from the eu calls for alternatives to be used when possible. Actually, drugs would be safer than they are now if the animal testing phase was eliminated many studies have shown that animals predict correctly for humans only 5-25% of the time: far worse than tossing a coin. Although animal testing remains commonplace today, public support for such practices has declined in recent years testing regulations in the united states, the animal welfare act sets certain minimum requirements for the humane treatment of non-human animals in laboratories and other settings.
Animal testing has also assisted in developing vaccines against serious diseases and to help cure diseases diseases like rabies, polio, measles, rubella, and tb all have a vaccine out made possible by animal testing. Medical advances should be weighed up against the delays and tragedies caused by reliance on animal experiments – the thalidomide disaster whereby tens of thousands of children were born with severe deformities not predicted in animal tests, to name one of the most famous, but there are many others. In research and testing, animals are subjected to experiments that can include everything from testing new drugs to infecting with diseases, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage, implanting electrodes into the brain, maiming, blinding, and other painful and invasive procedures. It is often said that animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary this essay will examine the arguments for and against animal testing on the one hand, the people who support these experiments say that we must do tests on animals.
Facts about animal research pig), laproscopic surgical techniques (pig), and a drug for aids treatment (monkey) number of animals used time and time again, animal testing has proven its record as serving as an excellent indicator for how a drug will react in the human body. “if you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn't done anything they should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. The theory says that human and animal physiology is different and just because a treatment shows promise in an animal study, the likelihood of it showing the same results when it is retested on humans is limited.